Skip to main content

This website has been paid for by the University of Phoenix.

higheredureview.com

[HER] Higher Ed Review A practical guide to verifying college accreditation Contact [email protected]

Article

Accreditation and the 2019 FTC settlement: separate records

The 2019 Federal Trade Commission settlement and the HLC accreditation record for University of Phoenix are separate regulatory documents that describe different matters. The FTC settlement addresses consumer-protection and marketing conduct. The HLC accreditation record addresses institutional academic quality and compliance with accreditation standards. These two records are frequently encountered together in search results, which creates an association that the records themselves do not support. HLC did not issue an adverse accreditation action in connection with the FTC settlement.

What the FTC settlement covered

The FTC allegations concerned marketing and recruiting practices at University of Phoenix during 2012 to 2016, when the University was owned by Apollo Education Group, a publicly traded company. The FTC alleged that the University used misleading advertising about job placement, career advancement, and employer partnerships in its marketing to prospective students. The settlement, announced in 2019, resulted in a negotiated $191 million stipulated judgment, in which the University of Phoenix did not admit any wrongdoing, with $50 million paid in cash and the remainder provided as debt relief to students who were misled by the advertising.

The conduct covered by the FTC settlement occurred between 2012 and 2016. Apollo Education Group sold University of Phoenix in 2017 to a consortium of investors. The settlement was finalized under the new ownership but addressed conduct during the prior ownership period. This timeline is relevant for understanding the institutional context: the conduct alleged occurred under prior ownership; the 2023 HLC reaffirmation evaluated the institution under its current ownership and governance.

What the FTC settlement did not affect

The FTC settlement did not result in HLC taking any adverse accreditation action against University of Phoenix. HLC accreditation was not suspended, withdrawn, or placed on probation as a result of the settlement. The University continued its HLC accreditation relationship through the settlement period and subsequently received reaffirmation in 2023. The FTC settlement record and the HLC accreditation record exist in parallel - both are public, both are verifiable, and neither changes the content of the other.

How to read both records accurately

A complete institutional account of University of Phoenix includes both records in their proper context. The accreditation record shows: HLC institutional accreditation since 1978, a 2013 Notice subsequently resolved, and a 2023 reaffirmation, next evaluation 2032–2033. The FTC record shows: allegations for marketing and recruiting conduct from 2012 to 2016 under prior ownership by Apollo Education Group, settled in 2019 with a negotiated $191 million stipulated judgment in which the University of Phoenix did not admit any wrongdoing. Neither record should be omitted. Neither should be described in terms that apply to the other - the FTC settlement is not an accreditation action, and the accreditation record is not a judgment on the marketing conduct alleged in the FTC allegations.

Verification sources for both records

The FTC settlement record is publicly available at ftc.gov. The HLC accreditation record is available at hlcommission.org. The federal accreditation database record is at ope.ed.gov/dapip. University of Phoenix’s institutional disclosures, including its accreditation information, are at phoenix.edu/about/accreditation.html. These four sources together provide a complete, primary-source-based account of both the accreditation record and the regulatory record.

In 2017, University of Phoenix transitioned out from under Apollo Education Group into new ownership. The 2023 HLC reaffirmation evaluated the institution under that current ownership and governance structure - not as it operated during the period when the conduct alleged in the FTC settlement occurred.

Sources